From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e6545823a74c7c29 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: wemagor@sym1.cca.rockwell.com_nospam (Wayne Magor) Subject: Re: Fixed point design error in Ada95 Date: 1998/09/11 Message-ID: <6ta5h2$e0b2@onews.collins.rockwell.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 389978848 Distribution: world Sender: wemagor@sym1.cca.rockwell.com (Wayne Magor) References: <6t6ihg$dkn1@onews.collins.rockwell.com> Organization: Rockwell Collins - Avionics Reply-To: No@Junk.Mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-09-11T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: (Tucker Taft) writes: >www.adaic.org has an archive of comments. If you have your own comments, >you can send them to ada9x-mrt@inmet.com, where they will get logged, and >redistributed to all interested parties once a day. Something is wrong with that website. I get a site that talks about registering domains at site.register.com. When I go to the site the web address changes to this: http://adaic.org/future.shtml Do you know why it is doing that? Is it still working for you? By the way, why did the pragma to give Ada83 operation for fixed point operators go nowhere? Not enough interest or was it a more philosophical reason? Were there strong objections to adding that pragma? Thanks, Wayne.