From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d2cca2df93731625 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dennison@telepath.com Subject: Re: Emacs Ada code navigation tools Date: 1998/09/10 Message-ID: <6t94gi$gr0$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 389809071 References: <35F6F05E.9A8F2DD0@elca-matrix.ch> <6t8n57$st7$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <6t8pri$d4t$1@fleetstreet.Austria.EU.net> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x11.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130 Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Sep 10 18:07:15 1998 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.05 [en] (WinNT; I) Date: 1998-09-10T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <6t8pri$d4t$1@fleetstreet.Austria.EU.net>, "Werner Pachler" wrote: > i have been using DEC/VAX with VMS, DEC Ada, LSE and VAX/VMS debugger > Especially after using the other Compilers, debuggers, etc. i thanked god > that he gave > the developers of DEC the power to develop these tools (including VMS). I can't disagree. The DEC development environment was definitely the best overall development environment it has ever been my pleasure to use. > >As I remember it, that required using a third tool (in addition to LSE and > >DecAda). As it has been about 8 years, I don't remember its three-letter > >acronym anymore. > > > I can't image what three-letter tool you mean. I think it was something like "DEC SCA" (source code analizer?). > The proplem you had was that your development environment had to less power > to be usefull. > Buy a faster VAX or Alpha... Well, at the time I was working on the fastest VMS systems available. We had some highly unrealistic speed requirements, and money was no object. We had a network of about 8 Vax Clusters each with two Vaxen and a shadow disk (to make up the quoroum if one Vax died). Each Vax had two processors. The developers each had their own DECstation, which was served off one of two of the clusters. Because nature of the work I was doing, I usually had an entire cluster to myself. SCA was just s l o w. That was 9 years ago, so I'm sure things improved. But at the time this was just about the fastest (DEC) setup around. -- T.E.D. -----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==----- http://www.dejanews.com/rg_mkgrp.xp Create Your Own Free Member Forum