From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,606ab2e12ad5a03a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: John McCabe Subject: Re: ADA vs. C++ Shared Memory Date: 1998/09/04 Message-ID: <6soc5n$ou@gcsin3.geccs.gecm.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 387787257 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <6sg034$fbc$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: Avatar Computer Consultants Limited Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-09-04T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: jerry@jvdsys.nextjk.stuyts.nl (Jerry van Dijk) wrote: >Stephen Leake (Stephen.Leake@gsfc.nasa.gov) wrote: > >: If you mean "shared memory between one process running Ada code and >: another process running C++ code", that's operating system and >: compiler dependent. > >Doesn't florist include this ? Yes, but that's operating system and compiler dependant :-) Well, to some extent anyway. Florist will provide interfaces to the POSIX system, but if your OS is not POSIX compliant, then Florist is not of much use to you. Also, if you have got a SUN/Solaris/GNAT system, Florist is apparently really easy to build and use, anything else could cause hassle. I, for example, had trouble building it on an Irix system, although that may only be as a result of the kernel configuration! -- Best Regards John McCabe ===================================================================== Not necessarily my company or service providers opinions. =====================================================================