From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,3132fa2f1b036425 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-03 02:20:03 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!tar-alcarin.cbb-automation.DE!not-for-mail From: Dmitry A. Kazakov Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: number_base Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 11:22:00 +0100 Message-ID: <6sacqvko1oh59usnqmprr17e38eb88o51d@4ax.com> References: <20619edc.0310311026.3a580ad4@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: tar-alcarin.cbb-automation.de (212.79.194.111) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1067854801 42386198 212.79.194.111 (16 [77047]) X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1951 Date: 2003-11-03T11:22:00+01:00 List-Id: On 31 Oct 2003 10:26:47 -0800, snarflemike@yahoo.com (Mike Silva) wrote: >Peter Hermann wrote in message news:... >> because of an immense practical value in data processing >> I would like to have an enlargement of the number_base > >What are some examples of the practical value of number bases greater than 16? With 32-bit UNICODE and Chinese hieroglyphs as the figures ... (:-)) --- Regards, Dmitry Kazakov www.dmitry-kazakov.de