From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fac41,9a0ff0bffdf63657 X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: f43e6,9a0ff0bffdf63657 X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,4b06f8f15f01a568 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,9a0ff0bffdf63657 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public From: gerryq@indigo.ie (Gerry Quinn) Subject: Re: Software landmines (was: Why C++ is successful) Date: 1998/08/20 Message-ID: <6rgs9f$h23$1@news.indigo.ie>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 382945862 References: <6qfhri$gs7$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <35cb8058.645630787@news.ne.mediaone.net> <902934874.2099.0.nnrp-10.c246a717@news.demon.co.uk> <6r1glm$bvh$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <6r9f8h$jtm$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <6renh8$ga7$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> Organization: Indigo Newsgroups: comp.lang.eiffel,comp.object,comp.software-eng,comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-08-20T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <6renh8$ga7$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>, ell@access.digex.net wrote: > >A 'return', at least in C/C++/VB, returns you to the place the current >procedure was called from. 'goto' control flow can be endlessly channeled >here and there and never has to return to where the initial linear control >flow was originally diverted. That seems to be a huge advantage of 'return' >over 'goto'. > I never realised that! Who are these fiends who rechannel my gotos? - Gerry ---------------------------------------------------------- gerryq@indigo.ie (Gerry Quinn) ----------------------------------------------------------