From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: fac41,9a0ff0bffdf63657 X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,4b06f8f15f01a568 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: f43e6,9a0ff0bffdf63657 X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,9a0ff0bffdf63657 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public From: "Jean-Pierre Rosen" Subject: Re: Why C++ is successful Date: 1998/08/14 Message-ID: <6r1e1a$mj$1@platane.wanadoo.fr>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 381096344 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit References: <6qfhri$gs7$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <35cb8058.645630787@news.ne.mediaone.net> <902934874.2099.0.nnrp-10.c246a717@news.demon.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Organization: Adalog Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.eiffel,comp.object,comp.software-eng,comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-08-14T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Robert Dewar a �crit dans le message ... >2) to write finite state machines encoding the state into the PC. Yes, some >people prefer case statements for this purpose, but many people prefer the >use of labels and gotos as the most obvious translation of labeled states >with arrows between them. I agree with this one, >For example, I find the following perfectly clear: > > <> for J in 1 .. N - 1 loop > if D (J) > D (J + 1) then > Swap (D(J), D(J + 1)); > goto Sort; > end if; > But not on this one, since: loop Inner: for J in 1 .. N - 1 loop if D (J) > D (J + 1) then Swap (D(J), D(J + 1)); exit Inner; end if; end loop; reflects the intent better (at least to my taste).