From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,b0f7b966bf5d7b74 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!wn13feed!worldnet.att.net!bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada From: anon@anon.org (anon) Subject: Re: File rename in Ada95 Reply-To: no to spamers (No@email.given.org) References: <1090f441-6358-4d59-a353-3f8a6b3f27e9@n1g2000prb.googlegroups.com> X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader/2 2.0 Message-ID: <6qvPk.14105$_Y1.7280@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 04:50:10 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.64.66.172 X-Complaints-To: abuse@worldnet.att.net X-Trace: bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 1225687810 12.64.66.172 (Mon, 03 Nov 2008 04:50:10 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 04:50:10 GMT Organization: AT&T Worldnet Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2557 Date: 2008-11-03T04:50:10+00:00 List-Id: No! I was telling you to it was not you problem until your stupid name calling post! You have other problems that most GNAT Ada users would prefer you deal with like getting Polyorb or Glade to work. But instead of improving GNAT Ada it seams that you would prefer to be the playground bully or busy body and getting into everybody business, instead. Some people such as schools would I think appreciate you spending your valuable time on Annex E instead of,. in here calling people name like a little spoiled brat. And remember this you started the name calling, I did not! In <1090f441-6358-4d59-a353-3f8a6b3f27e9@n1g2000prb.googlegroups.com>, Ludovic Brenta writes: >On Nov 2, 10:39 am, a...@anon.org (anon) wrote: >> Ludovic Brenta, Until you and your team of Ada supporters at least get >> "Polyorb" and/or GLADE up and running under the latest GNAT/gcc. You >> should bypass reading this forum. And the fix to those packages are easy. > >This kind of rhethoric will bring you only contempt. (1) you tried to >change the subject from Ada.Directories to PolyORB for no good reason; >(2) you tried a futile ad-hominem attack (did you really think you >would scare me away or otherwise impress me?) (3) if fixing PolyORB is >so easy, send "me and my team" a patch and "me and my team" will be >happy to incorporate it in Debian. Patches, not rants, will bring you >credibility. And (4), "me and my team" are volunteers and we take >orders from no one. > >[...] >> Because this is not the first post that Duff >> has assume that all GNAT users are using the latest GNAT version > >Here is another well-known and despicable rhethorical device: >unrelated and unsubstantiated claims that are impossible to prove or >disprove, with the only aim to create Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt. > >In my mind there is no Fear. I do not fear you or your rants, "anon". >There is no Uncertainty and no Doubt either. Ergo, you failed utterly >in your futile attempts. You only succeeded in bringing more hostility >to your posts. > >Enough. > >-- >Ludovic Brenta.