From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,63a41ccea0fc803a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: doylep@ecf.toronto.edu Subject: Re: Naming of Tagged Types and Associated Packages Date: 1998/08/07 Message-ID: <6qfp80$p0u$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 378917761 References: Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Fri Aug 07 20:49:04 1998 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.03 [en] (Win95; I) Date: 1998-08-07T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , Brian Rogoff wrote: > [...] that allows you to > use the same names for types and variables. I find that very ugly, but I'm > sure if I used Eiffel long enough my abhorence would diminish. I think you would, for two reasons: 1. Nothing's stopping you from making yourself use different names for everything. 2. It allows you to avoid contrivances by permitting things like this: class CAR feature steering_wheel : STEERING_WHEEL end What else are you going to call the steering wheel? A direction_control_device? I think any other name would be contrived. -PD -----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==----- http://www.dejanews.com/rg_mkgrp.xp Create Your Own Free Member Forum