From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,200b90a6173ca7b3,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: arthurw@bigfoot.com
Subject: GNAT and NaN
Date: 1998/08/06
Message-ID: <6qce91$i90$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 378518691
Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Aug 06 14:23:30 1998 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.05 [en] (WinNT; I ;Nav)
Date: 1998-08-06T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

This may be a lack of sufficient Ada knowledge, but is there a way to force
GNAT to generate Constraint_Errors instead of NaN values?

-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
http://www.dejanews.com/rg_mkgrp.xp   Create Your Own Free Member Forum