From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d89b08801f2aacae X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-03 07:34:00 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!feed2.news.rcn.net!feed1.news.rcn.net!rcn!not-for-mail From: Dan Nagle Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Is strong typing worth the cost? Date: Fri, 03 May 2002 10:32:15 -0400 Organization: Purple Sage Computing Solutions, Inc. Message-ID: <6q75du0i5j3u74elnkm49rn1gfsakgtatv@4ax.com> References: <3CCFFB7F.B8080F7A@despammed.com> <3CD1608B.A6336379@despammed.com> <3CD16D9E.912B1659@lmtas.lmco.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: UmFuZG9tSVbEp3JbXLaSDkp9wz2QDSB/1w8inyai+WFfdHTHKtKCwmbD/kEZ+Yjx X-Complaints-To: abuse@rcn.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 3 May 2002 14:33:11 GMT X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.9/32.560 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:23497 Date: 2002-05-03T14:33:11+00:00 List-Id: Hello, implicit none was standardized with f90, as was the rest of mil-std 1753. -- Cheers! Dan Nagle Purple Sage Computing Solutions, Inc. On Fri, 3 May 2002 08:44:41 +0000 (UTC), Preben Randhol wrote: >On Thu, 02 May 2002 14:48:16 -0400, Dan Nagle wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Better, use the Mil-Std-1753 (sp?) implicit none statement. >> >> De facto standard due to the necessity of the military market. > >Don't have it. We have a NAG F90 compiler only. > >Preben