From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,95d036084078aa89 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: tedennison@my-dejanews.com Subject: Re: Compiling, binding, and linking an Ada prog. interfaced with C Date: 1998/08/03 Message-ID: <6q4fdq$1a$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 377475791 References: <1998072706002200.CAA02664@ladder01.news.aol.com> <35BD28BF.A5B@atlas.otago.ac.nz> <6pn02g$2ue$1@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> <6q441b$o20$1@eplet.mira.net.au> Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Aug 03 13:54:02 1998 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.0; Windows NT; Gateway2000) Date: 1998-08-03T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <6q441b$o20$1@eplet.mira.net.au>, dccoote@werple.mira.net.au (David Coote) wrote: > Well, you could just support a subset of the language via a macro facility > interface to Ada. Certainly simple #def's like the one given earlier in the > thread might be useful for compatibility/porting. As a C programmer for many > years using Ada for the first time I for one would love to have some decent > support for conditional compilation. There are plenty of pre-processors out there you can use, if that's what you want to do. I for one don't like pre-processors (particularly the source code people generate for them), and am quite happy that the language doesn't have one. But nothing's preventing you from using one yourself. T.E.D. -----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==----- http://www.dejanews.com/rg_mkgrp.xp Create Your Own Free Member Forum