From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e7ac0b21c6d808e6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dennison@telepath.com
Subject: Re: Timing of ADA code
Date: 1998/08/03
Message-ID: <6q4cam$sbo$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 377462039
References: <35c12689.217545056@news.gatech.edu>
 <6psg15$a56$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <35c1cf02.40761361@news.gatech.edu>
 <6pssib$r9c$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <35c23701.67387591@news.gatech.edu>
 <Ex04Bp.55@jvdsys.nextjk.stuyts.nl> <35c37492.148697454@news.gatech.edu>
Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Aug 03 13:01:10 1998 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.0; Windows NT; Gateway2000)
Date: 1998-08-03T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <35c37492.148697454@news.gatech.edu>,
  bf14@prism.gatech.edu (Brian Franklin) wrote:
>   I looked at Calendar but if I understand the interface it appears
> that I can only get a accuracy to seconds and I would like to get at
> least 1/100 of a second.  I think the problem is the same with package
> Real_Time.
>

Look a little closer. The "seconds" it returns is a fixed-point (real) type,
not an integer. The exect accuracy should be spelled out in your compiler
documentation somewhere.

T.E.D.

-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
http://www.dejanews.com/rg_mkgrp.xp   Create Your Own Free Member Forum