From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,63a41ccea0fc803a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dennison@telepath.com Subject: Re: Naming of Tagged Types and Associated Packages Date: 1998/07/30 Message-ID: <6pq2ck$1pi$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 376357437 References: <6pdhfo$1br$1@platane.wanadoo.fr> <6pi0pf$df8$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <6pirk1$iar$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <6pknai$qst$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <6pl5rh$elr$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <35BF50B4.6FDCDDA0@west.raytheon.com> Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Jul 30 15:10:11 1998 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.0; Windows NT; Gateway2000) Date: 1998-07-30T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , Matthew Heaney wrote: > So let's use a neutral name like "File_Type", so that that all I have to > do is make a single change - to change the instantiation from > Sequential_IO to Direct_IO. All the file objects have the same type > name. All the operations have the same signiture too, so no code needs > changed. I still whould have gone with "File" instead of "File_Type". :-) T.E.D. -----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==----- http://www.dejanews.com/rg_mkgrp.xp Create Your Own Free Member Forum