From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,63a41ccea0fc803a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dennison@telepath.com Subject: Re: Naming of Tagged Types and Associated Packages Date: 1998/07/30 Message-ID: <6pq1mo$qm$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 376340338 References: <6pdhfo$1br$1@platane.wanadoo.fr> <6pi71p$n90$1@platane.wanadoo.fr> <6pk3jh$gpm$2@platane.wanadoo.fr> <6pkoir$sh6$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <6pmrkd$5v9$1@platane.wanadoo.fr> <6pnfkv$qkg$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <6pp9k8$77j$1@platane.wanadoo.fr> Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Jul 30 14:58:32 1998 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.0; Windows NT; Gateway2000) Date: 1998-07-30T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <6pp9k8$77j$1@platane.wanadoo.fr>, "Jean-Pierre Rosen" wrote: > In a client-server model, I tend to favour the client against the server; in > this context, it means that I choose a name that maximizes readability of > the *variable declaration*, not of the *type declaration*. I guess that's where you start to loose me. My philosophy is that *both* sides need to be readable. After all, its just as likely (if not more) that the server will break as the client. But again, this is the best overall approach I have found so far. (Plus, it seems to be somewhat of a standard now). T.E.D. -----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==----- http://www.dejanews.com/rg_mkgrp.xp Create Your Own Free Member Forum