From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a498aa1404ef5d87
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: nabbasi@earthlink.net
Subject: Re: Why C++ is successful
Date: 1998/07/29
Message-ID: <6potqg$auh@drn.newsguy.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 376243791
References: <35AE4621.2EBC7F6A@eiffel.com> <6p83vj$657$1@news.intellistor.com>
 <35B79E7D.6068DCDF@eiffel.com> <6pg7fg$qhi$1@news.interlog.com>
 <901533851.20058.0.nnrp-04.9e980ba3@news.demon.co.uk>
 <35be2a94.57352308@netnews.msn.com> <6plvgl$eaf$1@news-1.news.gte.net>
 <35bebe5f.95187031@netnews.msn.com> <6pmmd7$5t7@gcsin3.geccs.gecm.com>
Organization: Newsguy News Service [http://www.newsguy.com]
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-07-29T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <6pmmd7$5t7@gcsin3.geccs.gecm.com>, John says...

> My view now is that I would still like to learn C++, but only 
>really for interest, from what I know of Ada 95 and C++, Ada 95 certainly 
>seems to be the more understandable language and, with the increasing 
>size and complexity of software systems which require maintenance, I know 
>what I d rather maintain.
>

you might be interested in this C++ critque (sp?) :

http://www.progsoc.uts.edu.au/~geldridg/cpp/cppcv3.html

in particular this section:

http://www.progsoc.uts.edu.au/~geldridg/cpp/cppcv3/sect3/
                                                           
Nasser