From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,63a41ccea0fc803a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Norman H. Cohen" Subject: Re: Naming of Tagged Types and Associated Packages Date: 1998/07/28 Message-ID: <6pknto$163a$1@mdnews.btv.ibm.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 375666219 References: <6pdhfo$1br$1@platane.wanadoo.fr> <6pi0pf$df8$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <6pirk1$iar$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Organization: IBM Microelectronics Division Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-07-28T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: dennison@telepath.com wrote in message <6pirk1$iar$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>... >Again, you have encoded the fact that it is a type in the type's name. I don't >need that information, and it leads to really stupid looking things like >"Command_Type_Type". Consider Command_Variant_Type, or Command_Format_Type, or Command_Kind_Type. The _Type suffix serves not only to announce "This is a type name," but to leave other parts of the name space available for other purposes, e.g. for a variable or formal parameter named Command_Kind, of type Command_Kind_Type. -- Norman Cohen