From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7c0437014cb20f71
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: nabbasi@earthlink.net
Subject: Re: System.Address_to_Access_Conversions
Date: 1998/07/26
Message-ID: <6pgh2k$nse@drn.newsguy.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 375165371
References: <6odddl$k94$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <35AB9C59.74E529E0@magic.fr>
 <6ofn8e$5ff$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <6ofqvs$alm@hacgate2.hac.com>
 <6ogieq$qlo@drn.newsguy.com> <m3btqd964p.fsf@mheaney.ni.net>
 <6pes7b$f88@drn.newsguy.com> <m3ogud6mmi.fsf@mheaney.ni.net>
 <dewar.901493013@merv>
Organization: Newsguy News Service [http://www.newsguy.com]
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-07-26T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <dewar.901493013@merv>, dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu says...

(ref. paper on www.gnat.com on tags)

>Not even that is true, as I pointed out, this paper is ancient at this stage,
>and cannot even be taken as a necessarily accurate description of GNAT as
>it exists today.
>

It would be nice if one day some GNAT expert can write more updated paper 
on GNAT internals and how they implement things like tags and other 
important ada95 features. (I know, I can just look at the code, right?  :)

Nasser