From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,86e4f25e3cb89995,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: jlvojir1 <jlvojir1@gte.net>
Subject: Ada 200X?
Date: 1998/07/25
Message-ID: <6pdt77$qgo$1@news-1.news.gte.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 374924489
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: pfk@schnecke.offl.uni-jena.de
Organization: gte.net
X-Auth: DC1C921B5DDED6C047CF8491
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-07-25T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Excuse me sire,
    I ran acrosssome articles that you have writen in the Ada news
group.  I am purchasing books on the subject and having previous
experience with C/C++ I hope to make the conversion painlessly and join
your elit group, but a comment you said in your letter confused me.
Using the term "Ada 200x" I have never heard of this proposed standard
your where you just saying that whenever the next standard appears that
the team should add this.  I want to learn the newest Ada standard, the
notion that another standard is sneaking up just after I have invested
money and time in this venture and then be left behind with old news.

Please help to clarify --a hopefully newbie Joshua