From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2d56530d3025e324
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dennison@telepath.com
Subject: Re: Program error from assignment??
Date: 1998/07/22
Message-ID: <6p5jhi$j6m$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 373930825
References: <6p3070$bvn$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
 <6p4skk$j73$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <u7m15dbki.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov>
Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed Jul 22 20:54:10 1998 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.0; Windows NT; Gateway2000)
Date: 1998-07-22T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <u7m15dbki.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov>,
  Stephen Leake <Stephen.Leake@gsfc.nasa.gov> wrote:
> > levels, but in my book I should *never* fail an accessability check with
this
> > object. The access type is declared in a package spec.
...
> The compiler doesn't know that this routine is your main routine, so
> it assumes it could be called from some other routine; then the
> accessibility check makes sense. (uh oh; is this an advantage for C
> "main"? :).

Ahhh. I hadn't thought about the library routine angle. Thanks to you and
Jean- Pierre for pointing that out (and anyone else whose message I haven't
gotten to yet).

T.E.D.

-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
http://www.dejanews.com/rg_mkgrp.xp   Create Your Own Free Member Forum