From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ac7f55e4f0e5305 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Corey Ashford" Subject: Re: ADA [sic] to C++ Date: 1998/07/17 Message-ID: <6opfle$r8h$1@usenet.rational.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 372585986 References: <35AE5645.22501E3D@yahoo.com> <6ooev7$15d$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Organization: Rational Software Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-07-17T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: modula2000@hotmail.com wrote in message <6ooev7$15d$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>... >In article <35AE5645.22501E3D@yahoo.com>, > Harsha N S wrote: >> Hi All ! >> I am now working on some ADA [sic] code which I need to convert to >> C++. I am also ready to convert ADA [sic] to say X and then X to C++. > > I've never heard of a language called X. > Was that supposed to be funny? Perhaps this sort of attitude has contributed to the tendency for people to turn away from Ada. No matter what, people are going to call it ADA. Let'em be. What real difference does it make? Zip. - Corey