From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 100159,7efe49a1678baeac
X-Google-Attributes: gid100159,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7efe49a1678baeac
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Corey Ashford" <corSPAMey@rational.com>
Subject: Re: SGI Developer Magic - Ada95
Date: 1998/07/14
Message-ID: <6ohdop$8mv$1@usenet.rational.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 371584721
References: <35ABDCDF.7B8F@cae.ca>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
Organization: Rational Software
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.sys.sgi.misc
Date: 1998-07-14T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Viqar Abbasi wrote in message <35ABDCDF.7B8F@cae.ca>...
>Has anyone out there used the "SGI Developer Magic ProDev Ada95"
>compiler?
>
>The information provided on the SGI website
>(http://www.sgi.com/Products/DevMagic/products/project_ada95.html)
>seems to indicate that its the tool for the task at hand.
>
[snip]
>
>We don't need all the graphical-debugger and fancy stuff like
>that provided by SGI.  We just want a stable, robust Ada compiler,
>which produces object files we can link in with our existing software.
>Is SGI Ada95 the answer?


I'm fairly certain SGI's Ada95 compilation system is based on GNAT.
At least it was a year or so ago.

- Corey