From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7c0437014cb20f71
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "David C. Hoos, Sr." <david.c.hoos.sr@ada95.com>
Subject: Re: System.Address_to_Access_Conversions
Date: 1998/07/14
Message-ID: <6ogjhg$91@hacgate2.hac.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 371475376
References: <6odddl$k94$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <35AB9C59.74E529E0@magic.fr>
 <6ofn8e$5ff$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <6ofqvs$alm@hacgate2.hac.com>
 <6og7km$cqi$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
Organization: Hughes Aircraft Company
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-07-14T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


jsanchor@my-dejanews.com wrote in message
<6og7km$cqi$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>...
>>you are correct! Definitely my mistake. The package should have been
>instantiated with  dummy_type'class. Thank You.
Did you overlook my comment in my previous post about the perils of using a
tagged type for mapping to a specific address?