From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7c0437014cb20f71
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: jsanchor@my-dejanews.com
Subject: Re: System.Address_to_Access_Conversions
Date: 1998/07/14
Message-ID: <6og7km$cqi$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 371398659
References: <6odddl$k94$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <35AB9C59.74E529E0@magic.fr>
 <6ofn8e$5ff$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <6ofqvs$alm@hacgate2.hac.com>
Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
X-Article-Creation-Date: Tue Jul 14 18:22:14 1998 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.5.1 sun4u)
Date: 1998-07-14T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>



> With all due respect, sir you are wrong.  Therefore, the type with which the
package must be
> instantiated is the type of the object which you wish to locate at your
> specified address location -- not an access type or an address type, but the
> actual object type.
>
>you are correct! Definitely my mistake. The package should have been
instantiated with  dummy_type'class. Thank You.
Sincerely,
Jay S.
>

-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
http://www.dejanews.com/rg_mkgrp.xp   Create Your Own Free Member Forum