From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c615e41a65104004 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Dale Stanbrough Subject: Re: Ariane 5 failure (Was: Size code Ada and C) Date: 1998/07/10 Message-ID: <6o3sid$qn9$1@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 370045196 Distribution: world Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit References: <6navqt$shc$1@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-XXMessage-ID: Organization: RMIT Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-07-10T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: "You can always disable range checking in Ada, but was this the idea of Ada ???" The idea in Ada is that it gives you _more_ freedom than C. You have the freedom to check or not to check. The only option you have with C is to accept array index overflows, and try and find them in the debugger. Dale