From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1b24a190fcdd842e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: RSWhite@nospam.somewhere.ia.us (Robert S. White) Subject: Re: C/C++ cheaper than Ada?? how? Date: 1998/07/10 Message-ID: <6o3mrp$11u21@odie.mcleod.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 370062814 References: <6nubua$ocj@drn.newsguy.com> <35a3e989.208105089@news.mindspring.com> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII Organization: .. Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-07-10T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <35a3e989.208105089@news.mindspring.com>, munck@Mill-Creek-Systems.com says... > >Let's face it, folks, the Ada effort had us fooled for decades >into thinking that the DoD had a handle on software, >development environments, project management, etc. >We ignored the evidence from things like ICASE and >STARS because Ada seemed to indicate that they'd at >least gotten the basics right. Now that the current program >manager fad is C++, we hear their brain-dead justifications >for it and realize how deluded we were. Sic transit gloria Ada. Actually its not as bad as that. With the current Non-Developmental Item (NDI) philosophy of DoD product acquisition the use of Ada has turned into a non-mandate competitive edge. Suh! Keep it quiet! It's a competitive edge! Only companies with senior SW engineers who know how to effectively specify/justify Ada in the SW engineering developement plan (we are now SEI level 3 or higher now aren't we) and get the new/junior SW engineers trained (in Ada and other best practice SWE development methods) end up delivering product that works as required within spec. Avoiding warrenty SW bugs _does_ end up making a program profitable in the long run. The ability to get a high degree of software reuse and short time to market with new features/improvements maintains the market share, profit and competitive edge. IMHO & IME. I hope my competition tries to use C++ with only new personnel that don't understand embedded Real Time programming constraints! _____________________________________________________________________ Robert S. White -- An embedded systems software engineer e-mail reply to reverse of ( add .'s ): net mcleodusa shift2 r white