From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e0cf7e3240969324 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: esther@nina.pagesz.net (Esther Lumsdon) Subject: Re: ADA Developer in Colorado Springs Date: 1998/07/08 Message-ID: <6o0cg9$ig2$1@nina.pagesz.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 369612517 References: <3592E321.25D72EB@aerotek.com> <3593C8C1.65A9A716@swl.msd.ray.com> <6ne9sc$45i$1@news.hal-pc.org> Organization: Pagesz.net Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-07-08T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Jonathan Guthrie writes: >In comp.lang.ada John J Cupak Jr, CCP wrote: >> We don't say "CPLUSPLUS", so why do people >> persist in saying "ADA"? >For the same reason there are ads in the paper for "Cobal Programers". And PEARL programmers :-) Trust me, Aerotek recruiters have no technical knowledge. -- -- Esther Lumsdon esther@pagesz.net Speaking only for myself. Tomorrow, we shall be older, ...but shall we be wiser? -- Joan Walsh Anglund