From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1b24a190fcdd842e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Dale Stanbrough <dale@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au>
Subject: Re: C/C++ cheaper than Ada?? how?
Date: 1998/07/08
Message-ID: <6nugc8$n2n$1@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 369408149
Distribution: world
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
References: <6nubua$ocj@drn.newsguy.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-XXMessage-ID: <B1C90220AB011B17@obibicut.cs.rmit.edu.au>
Organization: RMIT
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-07-08T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

""DOD policy now places all programming languages on equal footing, where
 capability to provide the best support to the
 mission requirement will drive the solution selected, not a
one-size-fits-all
 mandate," Valletta said. ""

Ho ho ho!

"Please all people, forget all the innuendo you have heard about Ada,
 our policy is that all languages are on an equal footing"

Perhaps Valletta should undertake a course in psychology. I personally
doubt the professionallism of so many so called professionals to make an
informed, impartial disinterested choice.

Dale