From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,a86f1b04a0a258b4 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Jean-Pierre Rosen" Subject: Re: UML & Ada Date: 1998/06/18 Message-ID: <6md8dm$pk4$1@platane.wanadoo.fr>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 364133709 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit References: <35868F4A.FC463980@email.mot.com> <35880034.68F8@cs.umd.edu> <6m9f26$nkf@dfw-ixnews7.ix.netcom.com> <6malik$42b@gcsin3.geccs.gecm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Organization: Adalog Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-06-18T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: There is a book about HOOD4 (which, BTW, does support inheritance). You can find info about it at http://perso.wanadoo.fr/adalog/hoodbook.htm -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- J-P. Rosen (Rosen.Adalog@wanadoo.fr) Visit Adalog's web site at http://perso.wanadoo.fr/adalog John McCabe a �crit dans le message <6malik$42b@gcsin3.geccs.gecm.com>... >Richard D Riehle wrote: > >>What we need, for Ada, is an Ada-specific notation for object modeling, >>one which takes advantage of the power of Ada rather than the >>limitations of C++. I recall that Ed Colbert was working on a modeling >>notation that would map to Ada. I wonder if he is still pursuing this. > >As a matter of interest, have you checked out HOOD (Version 4)? I have >been led to believe that the mapping to Ada is quite good, but whether >HOOD has become more Object-Oriented rather than Object Based in its >transition from 3.1 to 4 I don't know. > >Also, TNI do a tool called STOOD which is supposed to have code >generation targeted to GNAT (or something like that). > >-- >Best Regards >John McCabe > >===================================================================== >Not necessarily my company or service providers opinions. >===================================================================== > >