From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e926b2112e1c83d7
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: John McCabe <jgm@hayling.cwmbran.gecm.com>
Subject: Re: [Q] Task Types
Date: 1998/06/09
Message-ID: <6ljl1t$iic@gcsin3.geccs.gecm.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 361050368
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <6lj3t7$dpd@gcsin3.geccs.gecm.com>
 <EuAI6t.IBz.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: GMS&T
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-06-09T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


stt@houdini.camb.inmet.com (Tucker Taft) wrote:
>John McCabe (jgm@hayling.cwmbran.gecm.com) wrote:
>
>: Is there a means of providing an incomplete declaration of a Task type?
>
>Yes.  An incomplete type declaration can be completed by *any*
>kind of type, including a task or protected type.
>
>Hence, the following is legal:
>
>    type T;
>  ....
>
>    task type T is ...
>

Brilliant. I'll try that. The problem I was having was that I was trying 
to use the syntax:

	task type T;
	   :
	   :
	task type T is.....


-- 
Best Regards
John McCabe

=====================================================================
Not necessarily my company or service providers opinions.
=====================================================================