From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a1d846d0e0466c9b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: do_while@ridgecrest.ca.us (Do-While Jones)
Subject: Re: Program (not task) Activation
Date: 1998/04/29
Message-ID: <6i7dfh$acr$1@owens.ridgecrest.ca.us>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 348753986
References: <#CDmPrma9GA.300@ntawwabp.compuserve.com>
 <6i2egl$o5$1@owens.ridgecrest.ca.us> <Es51yx.2o@jvdsys.nextjk.stuyts.nl>
 <6i7d46$9ik$1@owens.ridgecrest.ca.us>
Organization: RidgeNet - SLIP/PPP Internet, Ridgecrest, CA. (760) 371-3501
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-04-29T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <6i7d46$9ik$1@owens.ridgecrest.ca.us>,
Do-While Jones <do_while@ridgecrest.ca.us> wrote:
>Both of Jerry's
>test programs (C and Ada) returned error codes of 0 in every case.  So, my
>version of Windows 95 (4.00.950B, which came pre-installed on a new
>Gateway 2000 a couple of weeks ago) doesn't work like his version of
>Windows 95.  (Should I be surprised?) 
>

Oops!  I just re-read Jerry's message.  The C program didn't work on
his system, either.  So, it is a consistent Windows 95 problem.  (Should
that make me feel better?)

DWJ