From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 114669,94472ba0fa186a8d X-Google-Attributes: gid114669,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,94472ba0fa186a8d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1147fc,94472ba0fa186a8d X-Google-Attributes: gid1147fc,public From: eugene@cse.ucsc.edu (Eugene Miya) Subject: Acronyms was: ADA on the super Date: 1998/04/20 Message-ID: <6hghvr$qk1@darkstar.ucsc.edu>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 346110487 Distribution: inet References: <6h7v0c$r68$1@bambi.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE> <6ha2lu$5cb$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <6hgepl$1eh$1@camel18.mindspring.com> Followup-To: poster Organization: UC Santa Cruz CIS/CE Newsgroups: comp.sys.super,comp.parallel.mpi,comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-04-20T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <6hgepl$1eh$1@camel18.mindspring.com>, K. Mathias wrote: >See, this is where I get confused. Looking once again at the subject line, >I can't figure out why the American Dental Association would need such >high-performance anyway! Seems to me that a quality compiler such as GNAT >would just be overkill. >(sorry, I just couldn't resist) > Hey that's okay. As a lot of bright hardware hackers know, a modest number of their number easily qualify the the American Disabilities Act. We will never get away from naming collisions, but there are a few things we can do to maintain the news group(s). 8^)