From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6c7dea22b75ba442
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!out03a.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!in02.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!cycny01.gnilink.net!spamkiller2.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!trndny02.POSTED!c9e1c1fe!not-for-mail
From: Jeffrey Creem <jeff@thecreems.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: ada compiler?
References: <TYbZi.77377$kj1.12383@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
 <QPednZmRA_Te8KjanZ2dnUVZ_jednZ2d@comcast.com>
 <IooZi.12685$if6.3756@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
 <uklh05-6gt.ln1@newserver.thecreems.com>
 <lvsZi.13247$if6.1368@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
In-Reply-To: <lvsZi.13247$if6.1368@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <6hdj05-mm1.ln1@newserver.thecreems.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 14:15:01 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.168.122.204
X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net
X-Trace: trndny02 1194790501 71.168.122.204 (Sun, 11 Nov 2007 09:15:01 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 09:15:01 EST
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18277
Date: 2007-11-11T14:15:01+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

anon wrote:

> Now academic version of GNAT defaults to low integrity, while most 
> others Ada compilers default to high integrity including GNAT PRO. And 
> with a few vendors, the install program will ask for the desired 
> installation integrity level.
> 
> 
Wrong again. Normal GNATPro does not default to high integrity. I've got 
GNATPro on Solaris, Linux, vxWorks, Windows XP and none of them default 
to what you are calling high integrity.

e.g.
Under XP
gnatls -v
GNATLS Pro 6.0.2 (20070620-41)

Running isitada, returns

it is not Ada


I have been willing to take it on faith for a while that perhaps you 
have a version version of GNATPro (perhaps one for a DO-178B platform) 
that acts differently....

It also is quite odd to start talking about other vendorS when the 
switches we are discussing are all gcc ada switches. Most other Ada 
vendors are not using GCC and don't compile c,c++ and Ada as the 
original poster requested.

Granted, there are a few (at least one) other people selling Ada 
compilers based on gnat other than AdaCore so perhaps you are talking 
about them.