From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.42.82.79 with SMTP id c15mr6665924icl.7.1406278331263;
        Fri, 25 Jul 2014 01:52:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.140.86.105 with SMTP id o96mr14828qgd.11.1406278331227; Fri,
 25 Jul 2014 01:52:11 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news.glorb.com!h18no7243546igc.0!news-out.google.com!j6ni12934qas.0!nntp.google.com!v10no2408620qac.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 01:52:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <lqrbqh$5ek$1@speranza.aioe.org>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=91.55.222.226;
 posting-account=rmHyLAoAAADSQmMWJF0a_815Fdd96RDf
NNTP-Posting-Host: 91.55.222.226
References: <lqp0ke$mdh$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <33af85fe-a92c-415a-b6aa-c658d95ca18c@googlegroups.com>
 <lqrbqh$5ek$1@speranza.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <6fd2e985-1a41-442e-a6c8-6a9f90960e94@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Should be in the root package or its child?
From: AdaMagica <christ-usch.grein@t-online.de>
Injection-Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 08:52:11 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:21200
Date: 2014-07-25T01:52:11-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Thursday, July 24, 2014 6:21:40 PM UTC+2, Victor Porton wrote:

> package RDF.Raptor is
>
> end RDF.Raptor;

What do you gain with an empty package?

> But on the other hand, things become more finely classified if I use child 
> packages.

That's OK, this is the purpose of child packages. But again, what do gain with an empty top package and having the world in a child, especially if every user has to with it?

> So, do you insist, that it should not be in a child library package?

No, I don't insist - after all, it's your code.