From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.129.78.206 with SMTP id c197mr12537661ywb.2.1460707726169; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 01:08:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.157.5.209 with SMTP id 75mr168759otd.10.1460707726045; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 01:08:46 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!7no3136934qgj.0!news-out.google.com!u9ni55igk.0!nntp.google.com!gy3no4226247igb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 01:08:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=97.117.194.246; posting-account=x5rpZwoAAABMN2XPwcebPWPkebpwQNJG NNTP-Posting-Host: 97.117.194.246 References: User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <6ea18ce9-ae38-46a0-b84d-a91540c08f5a@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Help with PLplot bindings: How to pass a record of function pointers to a procedure From: Jerry Injection-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 08:08:46 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:30120 Date: 2016-04-15T01:08:45-07:00 List-Id: On Wednesday, April 13, 2016 at 9:43:58 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey R. Carter wrote: > Only addressing this part, type PLf2ops_Type has 2 components, both of which are > of access types. A value (aggregate) of this type must therefore contain 2 > access values. I suspect you want > > S_Plf2ops_C : Plf2ops_Type := > (Get => Plf2ops_C_Get'Access, Set => Plf2ops_C_Set'Access); > > Depending on what you're doing with them, you might want the access types and > the record type declared Convention C. > > -- > Jeff Carter > "Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent." > Foundation > 151 Many thanks, Jeff. You are correct on both counts. Jerry