From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4798cdf5e1c2b226
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Received: by 10.68.213.106 with SMTP id nr10mr1869878pbc.2.1335336593900;
        Tue, 24 Apr 2012 23:49:53 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 r9ni95929pbh.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!c28g2000vbu.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Vadim Godunko <vgodunko@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNADE still alive?
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 23:32:52 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <6e4b53df-8b38-4081-ab4d-66c0d302f00a@c28g2000vbu.googlegroups.com>
References: <20565278.30.1335224824186.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbvd8>
 <82haw9gvcl.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 95.153.179.241
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1335336593 10897 127.0.0.1 (25 Apr 2012 06:49:53
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 06:49:53 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: c28g2000vbu.googlegroups.com; posting-host=95.153.179.241;
 posting-account=niG3UgoAAAD7iQ3takWjEn_gw6D9X3ww
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:11.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/11.0,gzip(gfe)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: 2012-04-24T23:32:52-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Apr 24, 4:36=A0pm, Stephen Leake <stephen_le...@stephe-leake.org>
wrote:
>
> I think the pro versions of GNATcoll include SQLite, but not the current
> public version. I don't like the way AdaCore writes code (although I do
> like their compiler :), so I would find it hard to maintain/improve
> GNATcoll. But if you can afford an AdaCore support contract, that is
> definitely the way to go.
>
> QtAda has a database abstraction, and I think it can use an SQLite
> backend, but I didn't get very far trying to use it. There's a big C++
> intermediate between the Ada and the SQLite API, so it would be a pain
> to understand and maintain.
>
Another alive option is SQL module of Matreshka, its SQLite3 backend
is deployed on hundreds of machines.