From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AC_FROM_MANY_DOTS,BAYES_00
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b018778453c6e0e4
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Wilhelm Spickermann <quast.20.unbenutzbar@spamgourmet.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Pragma Unreferenced in GNAT GPL 2008
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 08:29:34 +0200
Message-ID: <6dj46eF2r37nU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <6d8f0qF1c5qaU1@mid.individual.net>
 <ruUbk.97809$102.21346@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Trace: individual.net CQz6W6DbwjRAwUPggcc0iwxrm4mHq/yS9iMtsoTapB7PeHwQ5i
Cancel-Lock: sha1:IvcoXrIaRsagQ0zbOxpzE/XXKY4=
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1043
Date: 2008-07-09T08:29:34+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

anon wrote:

> A quick patch is just to comment out the line. That way the
> file still maintains all original statements.

That won't help, as the pragma is already ignored. :-)

It's not a problem of getting things compiled -- it's just an
old "finger excercise" used to check the new compiler and I
wondered, if this new behaviour is to be expected.

Thanks,
Wilhelm