From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,42e401e32683b965
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!z7g2000yqb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Maciej Sobczak <see.my.homepage@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: A new notion: stronglly-typed-by-user language
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 13:17:36 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <6dd7682a-263a-48f5-bcc0-00a8a288afd2@z7g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
References: <hq6kht$kgl$1@news.eternal-september.org>
 <bdbc2b7d-49bb-4372-901e-001f9e796da9@b33g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
	<hq93i8$bl6$1@news.eternal-september.org>
 <aaea1354-19b1-4a94-9441-53e9cf970ac0@z11g2000yqz.googlegroups.com>
	<hqagqj$p7q$1@news.eternal-september.org>
 <cf5f7b42-219c-4a21-afd4-5c3f0c7b2068@k33g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
	<hqbgo7$bjk$1@news.eternal-september.org>
 <57119c7d-eb78-4904-a2de-bf183b03ccf0@r18g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
	<hqd0ab$m9o$1@news.eternal-september.org>
 <acc47575-b539-4e0d-8299-aacacee77e3e@11g2000yqr.googlegroups.com>
	<hqeeeb$6ie$1@news.eternal-september.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.62.146.25
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1271621857 18680 127.0.0.1 (18 Apr 2010 20:17:37
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 20:17:37 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: z7g2000yqb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=81.62.146.25;
	posting-account=bMuEOQoAAACUUr_ghL3RBIi5neBZ5w_S
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2) Gecko/20100115 Firefox/3.6,gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:10055
Date: 2010-04-18T13:17:36-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 18 Kwi, 10:04, "J-P. Rosen" <ro...@adalog.fr> wrote:

> I admit my C++ is a bit old, based mainly on Stroustrup where I picked
> this example from. Is current C++ differs, it is a good thing, but I
> still wonder
> 1) if your description is about standard (1998) C++?

This is where I looked at. If necessary/helpful I can provide relevant
citations and paragraph numbers.

> 2) if all compilers really behave like this?

I still don't have a fully-compliant Ada 2005 compiler, so...

Back to C++ - it does not matter what *all* compilers do; what does
matter in the industry is what the two most popular do (g++/VC++).
There are plenty of "C++" compilers around.

> Thanks for pointing out valid arguments!

There is no reason to hide them - awareness of problems benefits
everybody.

--
Maciej Sobczak * http://www.inspirel.com

YAMI4 - Messaging Solution for Distributed Systems
http://www.inspirel.com/yami4