From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AC_FROM_MANY_DOTS,BAYES_00 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,b018778453c6e0e4 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.kamp.net!newsfeed.kamp.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Wilhelm Spickermann Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Pragma Unreferenced in GNAT GPL 2008 Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2008 14:26:37 +0200 Message-ID: <6d97jtF1fq9sU1@mid.individual.net> References: <6d8f0qF1c5qaU1@mid.individual.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Trace: individual.net 8clkS8q1j7ExwVrMORMqZQU5ofT3C58rhfj+C4sgvYrzp6NLm0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:hHYI79NFyhqyccV7o78QrBkQoSE= Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1016 Date: 2008-07-05T14:26:37+02:00 List-Id: Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > But Wait_On need no parameters. It is OK to requeue to a > parameterless entry (9.5.4(3)) Oh, I missed that one and the family-solution. Thanks, Wilhelm