From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,50b378dbbc6317de
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!l32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Gautier write-only <gautier_niouzes@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: A generic image decoder - specification design
Date: Sat, 1 May 2010 13:30:23 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <6d7d1892-e8a1-444d-8ff2-3ee12e281f42@l32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <0fe40ae3-7582-424c-9b72-9d6d0cb351e2@y36g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.203.226.81
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1272745823 21813 127.0.0.1 (1 May 2010 20:30:23
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 1 May 2010 20:30:23 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: l32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=62.203.226.81;
	posting-account=gRqrnQkAAAAC_02ynnhqGk1VRQlve6ZG
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9)
	Gecko/20100317 SeaMonkey/2.0.4,gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:11277
Date: 2010-05-01T13:30:23-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Here is already a tiny update:

http://gen-img-dec.svn.sf.net/viewvc/gen-img-dec/gid.ads?view=markup&pathrev=2

I've discovered the possibility of an Inline pragma to a procedure
listed in a generic formal part. At least GNAT and ObjectAda don't
protest on that, so probably it makes some sense...

G.