From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,677963b1aa23e668
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!q12g2000prb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: KK6GM <mjsilva@scriptoriumdesigns.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: What's stopping you from using Ada for your next commercial
 project?
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 18:22:09 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <6d21e861-3700-42ac-aa9b-e7b59f58c852@q12g2000prb.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <fb3979d4-0335-474f-a62e-f71641969da8@p24g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 75.5.247.151
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1299723729 15767 127.0.0.1 (10 Mar 2011 02:22:09
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 02:22:09 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: q12g2000prb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=75.5.247.151;
 posting-account=qZVz2QoAAAAN9WxYp-9jYb7jORc4Zqwt
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 Trident/4.0; GTB6.6; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR
 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:18988
Date: 2011-03-09T18:22:09-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Mar 8, 2:23=A0pm, Lucretia <Lucretia9...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm just wondering what it would take for a company to choose Ada as
> their next implementation language?

One big problem, IMO, is that it seems to be almost impossible for
engineers to actually play with Ada (including its all-important
tasking and realtime features) on simple embedded hardware.  If you
could send them home with an under-$200 embedded board (like, say,
this one for $12: http://www.st.com/internet/evalboard/product/250863.jsp)
and some free plug-and-play tools (limited would be fine), then they
could actually get a feel for the benefits of Ada on their own.  Some,
at least (the clear-thinking ones?) would then become interested in
championing Ada in the workplace.  But if the engineers can't get
their hands on it in a low-cost exploratory fashion, why would they
champion it?

I am astonished that AdaCore, for example, doesn't offer plug-and-play
toolsets for a half-dozen assorted low-end boards, some with graphical
LCDs, some with ethernet, some with various analog and digital IOs,
just to prime the pump for their products.  They should do that and
sponsor some contests to help bring future supporters and customers
onto the bandwagon.