From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,344faf475a6f812a X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Received: by 10.224.88.200 with SMTP id b8mr26512936qam.8.1366868474618; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 22:41:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.50.43.225 with SMTP id z1mr3293206igl.9.1366868474547; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 22:41:14 -0700 (PDT) Path: ef9ni16888qab.0!nntp.google.com!gp5no6672895qab.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 22:41:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <56b5fa4b-8c61-4d1e-a17d-c3091226dca7@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.20.190.126; posting-account=lJ3JNwoAAAAQfH3VV9vttJLkThaxtTfC NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.20.190.126 References: <97967083-d21d-4de2-aeb8-76d0d5818993@googlegroups.com> <8131b9f6-c5ff-4b28-a2ae-599f4dcdda50@googlegroups.com> <56b5fa4b-8c61-4d1e-a17d-c3091226dca7@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <6d126104-fec4-4e95-84fb-000f1dc663be@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Interresting difference in Normal-Returns/Expression-Functions and Extended-Returns. From: Shark8 Injection-Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 05:41:14 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: 2013-04-24T22:41:14-07:00 List-Id: On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 11:30:49 PM UTC-6, egilhh wrote: > On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 4:40:28 PM UTC+2, Adam Beneschan wrote: >=20 > > The fact that the output of tests got mixed up isn't related to the sym= ptom the OP was talking about.=20 >=20 > But it is, when others are trying to reproduce the problem. When the orde= r of > output from three tests are intertwined, how do I know the order of outpu= t from > one of them? The ordering became intermingled when I replaced the anonymous accesses wit= h a named type; however, it did not occur in the code as presented on a Win= dows GNAT GPL ststem [quad-core]. That instance is something else that was surprising; intuitively, exiting t= he declare block should have only happened when the tasks were finished (an= d then all their allocations [which were local but no longer exist] should = be cleaned up (just as returning on a function should clear the local varia= bles on the stack).