From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,30352abc52760363 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: kenner@lab.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) Subject: Re: Delphi & Ada; Ada to C++ Date: 1998/02/21 Message-ID: <6cms2p$7pv$1@news.nyu.edu>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 327274666 References: <01bd3cc5$a74ff160$LocalHost@xhv46.dial.pipex.com> <6chg3h$4qf@universe.digex.net> X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.nyu.edu X-Trace: news.nyu.edu 888075161 7999 (None) 128.122.140.194 Organization: New York University Ultracomputer Research Lab Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-02-21T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article Simon Wright writes: >And even if it did, it's unlikely that you would be able to make a lot >of sense of it. Names would be mangled, strange and wonderful >constructs would appear, ... (just think about exceptions, generics, >...) you would not want to maintain the result! Actually, generics can be translated in a relatively straightforward manner since it's just macro substitution. Exceptions are trickier, but still can be done reasonable well. The real hard cases are variant records and unconstrained arrays.