From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 111d6b,328622178ec8b832 X-Google-Attributes: gid111d6b,public X-Google-Thread: 10d15b,328622178ec8b832 X-Google-Attributes: gid10d15b,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,8775b19e3c68a5dc X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,a03ae7f4e53958e1 X-Google-Attributes: gid1094ba,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,a03ae7f4e53958e1 X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,a03ae7f4e53958e1 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 114809,a03ae7f4e53958e1 X-Google-Attributes: gid114809,public From: stevens@adam.dseg.ti.com (Harold Stevens ** PLEASE SEE SIG **) Subject: Re: Which language pays most -- C++ vs. Java? Date: 1998/02/19 Message-ID: <6chufp$m1@sf18.dseg.ti.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 326672297 Sender: stevens@adam.dseg.ti.com (Harold Stevens) References: <6bti3r$e96$1@client3.news.psi.net> <34ec472f.21442215@globo.edinfor.pt> <6chq2d$hp8$1@nnrp2.snfc21.pbi.net> Organization: Raytheon TI Systems Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.misc,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.cobol,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-02-19T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In <6chq2d$hp8$1@nnrp2.snfc21.pbi.net> D J Mann: |> In Dik T. Winter: |> >In <34ec472f.21442215@globo.edinfor.pt> Paulo Pena: |> > > recieved != received |> > > "i" before "e" except after "c" |> > |> >Except when it's weird. |> |> Or its name is Keith. |> Or alias of wyrd. :) Regards, Weird (Harold Stevens) ** IMPORTANT EMAIL INFO ** 1. As antispam, I have completely disabled my "adam" email account. 2. Please vent inconvenience at Cyberpromo and their Satanic spawn. 3. You might try finding (wyrd) at ti, dotted with com. NO UCE/UBE. 4. I detest UCE/UBE. I support CAUCE; http://www.cauce.org HR 1748. Standard Disclaimer: My opinions alone and not Raytheon TI Systems.