From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 2002:a24:4502:: with SMTP id y2-v6mr3824187ita.0.1533145085750; Wed, 01 Aug 2018 10:38:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:aca:2b06:: with SMTP id i6-v6mr98932oik.0.1533145085582; Wed, 01 Aug 2018 10:38:05 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.uzoreto.com!4.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!g24-v6no1201iti.0!news-out.google.com!l67-v6ni16itl.0!nntp.google.com!d7-v6no2107itj.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2018 10:38:05 -0700 (PDT) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=73.205.150.94; posting-account=Ru7E4QoAAAC_HiQ2D8LjZ7rh1mbTNcVn NNTP-Posting-Host: 73.205.150.94 User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <6cfb0a23-91d0-4ebe-9291-426280e12913@googlegroups.com> Subject: Variant record memory storage question From: NiGHTS Injection-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2018 17:38:05 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:54008 Date: 2018-08-01T10:38:05-07:00 List-Id: Say I had a variant record like this: type Which_One is (Is_Small, Is_Big); type Variant_Record (Option : Which_One) is record case Option is when Is_Small => Var_1 : Byte -- 1 byte when Is_Big => Var_2 : Some_Large_Record -- 1000 bytes end case; end record; Will the record Variant_Record( Is_Small ) be stored as 1 byte? Or does it act almost like a C union allocating the memory for Variant_Record( Is_Big ) even though it will never morph at run-time? I am trying to determine the most memory-efficient way to store a complex record and it seems Variant_Record can help me do this, but I am unsure if it will work the way I think it will. Note I am using gcc. Thank you.