From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,6b26adc021beff24
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!q14g2000vbn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: qunying <zhu.qunying@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada binding to GMP and MPFR
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 10:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <6ce38a5b-8025-4417-accd-b678b54dbd5b@q14g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <72dd0e4d-1378-4cca-a72f-637f83f21686@e20g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>
	<4deb49a5-6d19-49dd-a7a8-ceed7adcb661@r3g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>
	<f048e5cb-2ade-4716-a2d2-8022eaa51473@v2g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.181.115.4
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1243616913 18956 127.0.0.1 (29 May 2009 17:08:33
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 17:08:33 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: q14g2000vbn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=208.181.115.4;
	posting-account=5q5YygoAAACq51EZyUjcDXZ0T5AqLVPG
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.10)
	Gecko/2009042315 Firefox/3.0.10,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:6107
Date: 2009-05-29T10:08:33-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Just some thought, it is mostly personal style taste. For mpfr.ads/
gmp.ads, you are using a style of gathering all pragma Import /
Convention statements into one place. Does moving those part more
close to the declaration itself make maintenance more easy?