From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b44a149ee4e73a99
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!dn9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?bj=F6rn_lundin?= <b.f.lundin@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Runtime check : what about you ?
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:06:47 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <6cadbbb8-034a-4d03-ab40-615fce6fb715@dn9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
References: <op.vw7rxjtgule2fv@douda-yannick>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.230.240.167
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1308326807 18466 127.0.0.1 (17 Jun 2011 16:06:47
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:06:47 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: dn9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.230.240.167;
 posting-account=3_reEwoAAAC163IAIrx427KYmwahFuh9
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-Google-Web-Client: true
X-Google-Header-Order: HUARLECNK
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_3 like Mac OS X;
 sv-se) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML,
 like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8J2 Safari/6533.18.5,gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:20894
Date: 2011-06-17T09:06:47-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 17 Juni, 11:42, Yannick Duch=EAne (Hibou57)
<yannick_duch...@yahoo.fr> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Just out of curiosity as much as because this may be worth to discuss it =
=A0
> to some (at least because there are some reflex with that) : how many of =
=A0
> your typically compile releases with runtime check and how many of you =
=A0
> typically compile releases without runtime checks

On all systems and platforms - Windows/aix
We use gnato and fstack-check
On some systems we went from -O0 to -O2
Disaster on both platforms. We also use -g
This is with gnat pro.
The trouble with -O2 is probably fixed, this was
several years ago.

Warehouse management/control system.
The penalty is overweighed by
Ease of find reasons for crashes
(if we get them)
--
Bj=F6rn