From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2a17785321e80884
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Oliver.Kellogg@vs.dasa.de
Subject: Re: Redundant With Remover
Date: 1998/02/16
Message-ID: <6c9c0k$gtv$1@nnrp2.dejanews.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 325522434
References: <886175452.1936588810@dejanews.com>
 <34D32B8E.F86335E1@elca-matrix.ch> <886514539.1408368642@dejanews.com>
 <dewar.886515827@merv>
X-Originating-IP-Addr: 53.16.22.2
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/2.0 (compatible; MSIE 3.02;
 Windows NT) via proxy gateway CERN-HTTPD/3.0 libwww/2.17
Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Feb 16 12:38:44 1998 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-02-16T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


For finding whether the same unit is withed more than once in an
Ada unit, you can also use the verbose flat mode of withlist.pl,

http://sw-eng.falls-church.va.us/AdaIC/tools/withlist/withlist-pl.txt

This is just a side note and does not really answer the original poster's
question of finding whether a single "with" is necessary or not.

--Oliver

-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
http://www.dejanews.com/   Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading