From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ecc38b3271b36b88
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!w9g2000prg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: ytomino <aghia05@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: What is the warning about builtin-function on gcc-4.6.0 ?
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 03:07:40 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <6c748f70-7e75-49b4-a467-d1d2d6b24323@w9g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
References: <b7736fb9-8593-47cc-9ac5-58a95ff6be5f@34g2000pru.googlegroups.com>
 <87aagiclte.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
 <475d10ca-5d4e-490c-9b88-e12cd3cd3faa@b13g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
 <87d3lejjyv.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 114.164.26.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1301134060 30320 127.0.0.1 (26 Mar 2011 10:07:40
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 10:07:40 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: w9g2000prg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=114.164.26.2;
 posting-account=Mi71UQoAAACnFhXo1NVxPlurinchtkIj
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_8; en-US)
 AppleWebKit/534.16 (KHTML,
 like Gecko) Chrome/10.0.648.151 Safari/534.16,gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18463
Date: 2011-03-26T03:07:40-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Mar 26, 6:43=A0pm, Florian Weimer <f...@deneb.enyo.de> wrote:
> Perhaps the warning should only check if the argument is a
> floating-point type. =A0It might it work in this case. =A0But the
> underlying problem is that the import mechanism only targets C-like
> functions, and those overloaded C99 functions are not really C-like at
> all.

OK, I understand.
Thank you, Florian.

nn...then, there are no function to take infinity and NaN...