From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM,FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:86a0:: with SMTP id
 q32-v6mr15768875ioi.51.1526344132987;
        Mon, 14 May 2018 17:28:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:4814:: with SMTP id
 c20-v6mr1010569otf.6.1526344132792;
 Mon, 14 May 2018 17:28:52 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!border1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed8.news.xs4all.nl!85.12.16.69.MISMATCH!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!v8-v6no3309040itc.0!news-out.google.com!f20-v6ni3744itd.0!nntp.google.com!v8-v6no3309037itc.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 17:28:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <b0a9cf48-6a6f-4f10-93a7-fd77c427728c@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=85.240.211.224;
 posting-account=rhqvKAoAAABpikMmPHJSZh4400BboHwT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.240.211.224
References: <edf7b96a-f340-408c-994f-d5aa73b9f2db@googlegroups.com>
 <p8pe94$3pv$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk> <p8rhjh$e44$1@dont-email.me>
 <42387d28-c983-4e58-9522-815ccd1ad0fb@googlegroups.com>
 <p8unbg$soe$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
 <b0a9cf48-6a6f-4f10-93a7-fd77c427728c@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <6c1e643d-b826-4b8b-b61c-13c56428ed23@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: little precision about anonymous access types
From: Mehdi Saada <00120260a@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 00:28:52 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 1879
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2815226637
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:52351
Date: 2018-05-14T17:28:52-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I should ask this in another way: what strategy do you use with user-define=
d storage pools ? I can guess that since the user doesn't have as much "met=
alinguistic" on types and objects as the compiler, there's a limit to how m=
uch automatic and complex one might for instance,
build a default storage pool for anonymous access objects.