From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,53c7a24d13241b98
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Kenneth W. Sodemann" <stufflehead@bigfoot.com>
Subject: Re: Standadised OO Language
Date: 1998/02/12
Message-ID: <6bur94$k8n$1@news3.alpha.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 324423402
References: <34E2D3D9.B2F1F398@adelaide.on.net>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-02-12T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Matthew Daniel wrote in message <34E2D3D9.B2F1F398@adelaide.on.net>...
>After Having a "discussion" with one of the engineers at work,  he is an
>Ada "hater" and I am the Ada "lover", about standadised OO languages, I
>said Ada95 was the only one, well at least 6 months ago, he said C++ has
>an ANSI standard and has for a couple of years.
>
>I was just wondering if I was correct or totally wrong.
>


You are wrong, and so is your friend.  C++ does have an ANSI standard,
however it was only ratified within the last couple of months (the first
announcement I saw of it was in last months "C/C++ Users Journal").

I would also be surprised if some other OO language (like Smalltalk) were
not standardized, but I cannot speak to that, as the two main languages I
work with are Ada and C++.

--
Ken Sodemann
stufflehead@bigfoot.com
http://www.pcii.net/~stuffel
Go 23, 24, 36, & ABE.  Go Pack!!